Children’s Dental Health: Braces and the 3D Imaging Controversy

With the invention of 3D x-rays came great excitement, and though the technology is undeniably worth the praise, it can also be harmful if used in the wrong setting.

Researchers and experts are now saying that it is not wise for dentists and orthodontists to order the new high resolution imaging for common, every day orthodontic cases, as it can expose children to excess radiation.

The number of orthodontists relying on this technology on a regular basis is still small, but experts agree that the continued use on children in unnecessary conditions could lead to problems in the future.

It is often perfectly acceptable and just as useful to opt for the two dimensional technology.

Professionals in the dental field are quick to remark that the amount of radiation produced by 3D X-rays varies substantially, depending on the machine used.

While the amounts, in most cases, are minimal, there are concerns that some clinicians may be unaware of the differences in radiation levels between 2D and 3D imaging.

A single three dimensional image could produce two to five times the radiation produced for an entire series of 2D x-rays.

This is not to say that orthodontists should turn their backs on the technology all together. It does have a very practical purpose in the field that is invaluable.

Researchers simply suggest that the decision of which technology best suits the problem at hand be weighed carefully.

The choice to use the 3D imaging on a patient for generally scanning purposes should be made on a case-by-case basis, weighing the pros and cons of each method.

For more information on the controversy regarding this new technology, visit the full article.